Tuesday, 11 June 2013

Yeh Jawani Hai Deewani

There was a boy and there was a girl and they were best friends. No, there were two boys and there was a girl and they were best friends. And there was some cross-crushing, but they did not fall in love and marry and let the third friend drop off like an unwanted appendage, thank god.
It helped that there was a Deepika Padukone to add an extra angle to what could have turned into a hackneyed and sorry love triangle, of course.
Yeh Jawani Hai Deewani is Bollywood candyfloss, lifted a little beyond average by a smart script and a strict check on tears. There are some of course, which romance comes without any? But like I said, director Ayan Mukherji kept his actors on a tight leash.

Mukherji is smart. Like with his last movie, he sticks to the generation he knows best and raises questions that are likely to rattle it the most. And he crushes that silly adage Bollywood has been tattooing in our minds for ages and ages, ever since a jilted Parvin Dastur yelled at a cowering Bhagyashree “ek ladka ladki kabhi dost nahi bann saktey.”

The chemistry between Ranbir Kapoor, Kalki Koechlin, Aditya Roy Kapur and later , Deepika Padukone reminds one of the ease and comfort we saw in “Jo Jeeta Wahi Sikandar”, but of course, the later was a different story altogether. But what a movie!

As for Yeh Jawani Hai Deewani, we have it all: we have attractive women and attractive men who travel to exotic places, or don’t. As long as they all look good. We have money, we have love, we have friendship and we have lovely songs. Oh and we have some amazing dancing. So, we have a hit!

The movie isn't going to be remembered as Ranbir Kapoor’s best performance, but it will help him and the others make a lot of money. And, it should be remembered, justifiably, for his dancing. Kapoor’ll never be a Hritik Roshan but what Remo makes him do in this movie is nothing short of spectacular, be it his retro moves to Western (ok, inspired) beats or his perfect expressions while courting Madhuri Dixit to very Indian moves.
Speaking of, our lady never fails to charm, does she?
Nearing fifty, and still the most graceful heroine on screen today. Only, I wish she did not give in to that hand movement in the “Via-agra” song, The Dixit who is confident enough to sportingly dance with a male lead much much younger to her to “Tu sham ki tarha dhal gayi” does not really need vague sleaze to draw the crowds. All she needs to do is smile, we’ve known that since she took the stage as Mohini a very long time ago.

Mukherji throws her at us at the very beginning of the movie, gets us in the mood (thanks Rekha Bharadwaj and Pritam), makes us dance a bit with her (or jiggle in our seats, depending on how shy you are) and then takes us on a journey across the world, while raising some very pertinent-to-working-youngs-but-been-asked-two thousand-times-already questions.

The eternal tussle between home and the world, career and family. In the course of which, Koechlin, Roy Kapur and Padukone all help the distraught hero find his way. They are all largely being themselves: single, working city dwellers, and they are all good actors, so they do their job well. The acting is easy and devoid of any unnecessary drama, the chemistry does not make you cringe. Quite the opposite actually, it is warm and comfortable.

Padukone loses her glasses and turns into her gorgeous self in the process and Koechlin loses her grunge look and wears a very pretty “ghaghra choli”, but then, what else is growing up?

Which, however, I won’t say Mukherji did with this one, despite the movie being a decently good watch. I mean, he debuted with “Wake up Sid” and then slipped into kind of formulaic candyfloss. But then one understands the need to make money and get some fame. As long as that money (ours, from the tickets) is invested back into another Sid-like venture in the next.

In the meanwhile, romance and song and dance lovers (me included) will watch this one one more time and this year’s Diwali will have many stage shows of “Dilliwali Girlfriend” and “Balam Pichkari”.
But then if they spice up a movie with not one but three such numbers, can you blame the audience?


Monday, 3 June 2013

Rituparno Ghosh: what he showed an average movie goer


There are famous men, and then there are famous men. There are those that you know of, because they are on TV, have won awards and are popular. And then there are those that touch your lives. You don’t know them personally but wish with all your heart you did, because when you know them through their works, you feel like it makes you a better person.

I was inadvertently introduced to Rituparno Ghosh by my mother in the early 90s. The mother, you see, is hugely responsible for turning the daughter into a lover of Indian cinema. I watched Qayamat se Qayamat Tak even before I was enrolled in school and fell in love with Salman Khan in Maine Pyaar Kiya when I was 4 years old. Yes, that happened. And continued, till our man decide to go black-buck hunting, at which point I decided sanity is important even while crushing on screen actors.
Anyway, so ma was making plans to go watch a movie (Bengali!) and I was not a part of it. Grumble, grumble, some heated words and a conversation that ended in “it is not a movie for kids.”
This was before Google was omnipresent and at our beck and call, so it took me some time before I read up on reviews of Unishe April, and whatever I could find about this new director. Background here: this was at a time when no self respecting middle class Bengali bhadralok would go watch a Bengali commercial movie in theatres. And I don’t blame them. The 90s gave us some really really mind numbingly stupid atrocities in the name of cinema. At least in Bollywood, the women were pretty and the men were handsome, and there were good songs.
Bengali movies during this time were really just on-screen versions of jatra, (look it up, I don’t know how to translate that in English) with garish red lipstick and yellow blouses and high pitched dialogue delivery. How do I know? Well.
Eventually Ma said I could come if I wanted to. I went, with a big show of reluctance (who wants to go watch a Bengali movie? Also, you said no, so I won’t go any more, etc) and 30 minutes into the movie I knew I had watched one of the best movies in my 10 years of living. Note here, after that, every time I watched a Ghosh movie, I felt the same. I haven't watched Sunglass yet, but am very familiar with every other movie made by him that has seen the light of day.  
So Ghosh took Bengali commercial movies by its horns and completely turned it over. People in his movies did not yell and scream, they did not wear strange clothes and actually felt like real people.
Much like Rowling did with reading, Ghosh re-introduced the Bengali middle class to Bangla movies. And remember, for a people whose standards are the likes of Satyajit Ray and Ritwik Ghatak that is no small task.
But here’s the thing, Ray and Ghatak were long gone, and then there were none. Except for the one odd Aparna Sen, but her movies were/are too few to bring a massive cultural change. It was almost like the cinema gods were punishing the local industry in their attempt to maintain equilibrium of quality. Like the gods were saying “you Bengalis have gotten too used to high quality in Ray, Sen, Ghatak, so now you’ll have to deal with just the opposite. We give you inanity like there never was.”
In the meanwhile, an entire generation grew up going to English medium schools, went out for fancy dinners and had started experimenting with foreign concepts like “dating”, had already made jeans and making-out a part of their growing up, and equaled bangla movies with rustic nonsense.
Then Ghosh came along, changed all of that, and even made his audience think.

When he told a story, you listened. Watched, but you know what I mean. And because Ghosh was an extremely intelligent man, he knew exactly how to hook his target audience: the well schooled but very averse-to-change middle class.
So his characters would sing Rabindrasangeet and quote Tagore and Shakespeare, and the middle-class erudite would feel safe in his movies. “Look, these are people just like us!”
Then, they would cheat, hurt, fight and even rape behind closed doors. “Look, these are people just like us!”
He “got” women, and when he recreated Binodini on screen, you were enamored by her silent strength.  Then, because you are a good middle class man/woman, you’d say you’d rather an Asha than a Binod, but Ghosh showed you how just like there are men and boys, there are women and girls. His Binod can, without missing a beat, retort, “shongo korbey, chinho rakhbey na, taai kokhono hoy?” (Somewhat crudely, "you'll want to mate but you won't have any imprint on yourself, how is that fair?") I think Tagore would have approved. 

Then he took his prowess to Bollywood and gave the industry one of its finest dramas in the name of Raincoat. In which he retold O’Henry’s Gift of the Magi, and said so clearly. But because he was a man who knew what he wanted and knew he was the best at it, he largely stuck to Bengali and instead of chasing famous actors in their industry, got them to come down to his land and remade them. Aishwarya Rai, Amitabh Bachchan, Rakhi, Abhishek Bachchan, Sharmila Tagore. All remade by Ghosh.

And while doing all this, he boldly cross-dressed and shred a mimicry artist to pieces in a talk show when he decided the world had had enough cheap humour at the expense of men like him. Effeminate, like he put it. 
And he does it confidently, gracefully, with a smile and never once raising his voice. Just like in his movies. While the infinitely more “manly” TV artist looked on like a deer caught in headlights, and struggled to find coherent words.

And he was brave. He retold Tagore’s Chitrangada to suit today’s world, he used his own voice to dub for a woman’s character in a movie, he portrayed the story of a gay man and his mother’s shock when she found out, he talked of marital rape ages ago when the Indian legal system will still not recognize it, he composed songs in Brajbuli and he told us, much like many many great authors have told us over and over again : it is important to think, it is important to be compassionate and liberal and open to ideas, and it is important to stand up for your rights and against encroachment and it can all be done beautifully, without raising your voice. 

This is how the middle class Bengali went back to the theatres. Which is how they can now dare to experiment within the commercial framework and even get funding for these movies. I can still remember a time, not very long ago, when a movie about three girl friends would be only released in Nandan (art-film circles) and sink without a trace. And many movies, like Bhooter Bhobisyot would not be made because, maybe, no one would fund it. Today, cool hipsters go watch them with popcorn and sodas.